You're the product manager for Tiltbrush, Google's VR painting app. Describe your prioritization process.

My prioritization process for Tiltbrush would focus on balancing user value, technical feasibility, and strategic alignment with Google's broader goals. I'd start by gathering input from various sources: user feedback (forums, surveys, analytics), engineering team insights on technical debt and new opportunities, and stakeholder input from marketing and leadership.

I'd then categorize potential features and improvements based on their potential impact and effort. Common frameworks like RICE (Reach, Impact, Confidence, Effort) or a simple value vs. complexity matrix would be useful here.

Key considerations would include:

• User Impact: How many users will this benefit, and how significantly will it improve their experience?
• Technical Feasibility & Cost: What are the engineering resources required? Are there significant technical hurdles or dependencies?
• Strategic Alignment: Does this feature support Tiltbrush's mission and Google's overall VR/AR strategy? Does it drive adoption or engagement?
• Innovation & Differentiation: Does this move the needle in the VR art space and set us apart from competitors?

I'd use these criteria to build a prioritized roadmap, focusing on delivering incremental value while also making space for larger, more innovative projects. Regular review and iteration of the roadmap based on new data and learnings would be crucial.