EasyBehavioralHiring manager5 min to answer

Tell me about the hardest technical challenge you solved.

Asked at

Palantir

1Give yourself 5 minutes

2Answer out loud, not in your head

3Then compare with the answer below

Stuck? Show a way to structure it+

01Clarify the objective, user, constraints, and acceptable failure modes.
02Structure the response around context, constraints, personal contribution, impact.
03Compare credible alternatives and state the decision criteria.
04Finish with validation, monitoring, and what would change the decision.

Reference answer

strong answer

I would first define the outcome and acceptable error boundary. I would explicitly cover context, constraints, personal contribution, impact. I would select an approach only after comparing quality, latency, cost, safety, and operational complexity, then validate it with representative cases and production monitoring.

context
constraints
personal contribution
impact

Must be adapted to the interviewer’s scenario
Would benefit from concrete numbers and personal examples

alternative answer

A second valid approach is to begin with the highest-risk assumption and test it cheaply. I would explicitly cover context, constraints, personal contribution, impact. I would select an approach only after comparing quality, latency, cost, safety, and operational complexity, then validate it with representative cases and production monitoring.

context
constraints
personal contribution
impact

Must be adapted to the interviewer’s scenario
Would benefit from concrete numbers and personal examples

Grade yourself

context

weight 30%

StrongExplains context concretely and ties it to a decision or measurable outcome.

WeakMentions context without implications, trade-offs, or evidence.

constraints

weight 25%

StrongExplains constraints concretely and ties it to a decision or measurable outcome.

WeakMentions constraints without implications, trade-offs, or evidence.

personal contribution

weight 25%

StrongExplains personal contribution concretely and ties it to a decision or measurable outcome.

WeakMentions personal contribution without implications, trade-offs, or evidence.

impact

weight 20%

StrongExplains impact concretely and ties it to a decision or measurable outcome.

WeakMentions impact without implications, trade-offs, or evidence.

Then expect these follow-ups

What did you personally own?
Tests: depth
What would you do differently?
Tests: adaptability
How did you measure the result?
Tests: adaptability

Free to read · better with Enzo

Practice this out loud with Enzo

Enzo runs it as a mock interview, pushes back with follow-ups, and grades you on the rubric.

Continue with Enzo Sign up free

Next question