G2i Inc.G2i Inc.

Senior Python Engineer - LLM Code Evaluation

United StatesRemoteStaffCONTRACTORtodayFresh

Contract | $100–$200/hour | 10–20 hrs/week [Check out this Loom video for more details!](https://www.loom.com/share/b0d1b0bf24c44ae8b95dca84b9db60e5) We’re looking for highly experienced software engineer (SR+) to help evaluate the quality of interactions with modern coding agents such as OpenAI Codex and Claude Code.

Python

Senior AI Interaction Evaluator (Codex / Claude Code)

Contract | $100–$200/hour | 10–20 hrs/week

Check out this Loom video for more details!

We’re looking for highly experienced software engineer (SR+) to help evaluate the quality of interactions with modern coding agents such as OpenAI Codex and Claude Code.

This is not a traditional engineering role.

You won’t be writing production code. You’ll be evaluating something harder: whether the modelthinkslike a great engineer.

What This Role Actually Is

You will assess how AI coding agents behave in real-world scenarios — focusing on:

  • Whether the response makes sense
  • Whether the preamble and reasoning are useful
  • Whether the output reflects strong engineering judgment
  • Whether the interaction feels right to an experienced developer

This role is about engineering taste — not syntax correctness.

What You’ll Be Doing

  • Evaluate AI-generated coding interactions end-to-end

  • Judge whether outputs are: Useful

  • Correct (at a high level)

  • Aligned with how a strong engineer would think

  • Assess the quality of explanations and reasoning , not just code

  • Distinguish between different levels of response quality (e.g. what makes something a 2 vs 4 )

  • Provide clear, opinionated feedback on: What worked

  • What didn’t

  • What felt “off” or misleading

  • Help define what great looks like when interacting with tools like Cursor

What We Mean by “Taste”

We’re specifically looking for engineers who can answer questions like:

  • Does this feel like something a strong engineer would actually say?
  • Is this explanation helpful, or just technically correct?
  • Is the model guiding the user well, or just dumping output?
  • Would this interaction build or erode trust?

You should be comfortable making subjective but rigorous judgments.

Who You Are

  • Staff / Principal-level engineer (or equivalent experience)

  • Strong background in one of the below: TypeScript / JavaScript

  • Python

  • Hands-on experience using: OpenAI Codex

  • Claude Code

  • Cursor

  • Deep familiarity with modern AI-assisted dev workflows

  • Able to evaluate code without needing to fully execute or deeply review every line

  • Comfortable giving direct, opinionated feedback

  • High bar for what “good engineering” looks like

Nice to Have

  • Experience with tools like Cursor or similar AI-first IDEs
  • Prior exposure to prompt design or evaluation workflows
  • Experience mentoring senior engineers or defining engineering standards

Engagement Details

  • Rate: $100–$200/hour
  • Hours: ~10–20 hours/week
  • Duration: Through early May (with possible extension)
  • Start: ASAP
  • Process: Take-home evaluation exercise
  • One behavioral interview

Frequently asked

Is this Senior Python Engineer - LLM Code Evaluation role remote?

Yes — this role is remote-friendly (United States).

Related